In the article “Green buildings, Singapore’s natural ally for a greener future” by MacKenzie (2017), It was reported that Singapore's continuous growth has redefined utilitarian designs of green buildings, adding weight to its contribution in tackling climate change. Being densely populated, Singapore generates high power consumption. The Building Construction Authority of Singapore (BCA) has planned to overcome the issue by targeting to certify 80 percent of building with the Green Mark by 2030, as well as raising awareness about climate change. Many planners are also starting to enforce eco-friendly systems and materials into buildings. Contrary to popular belief, it is not hefty to integrate environmental elements to the building’s design. The integration would serve as cost-efficient investments that are beneficial in the long run. It involves using light colors, maximizing natural light, leveraging technology, installing suitable elements that promote sustainability and working with stakeholders. In working towards a greener future, making prudent decisions on a building’s design is critical, as it would be a pivotal weapon in Singapore’s fight against climate change.
While the article clearly stated what BCA aimed to achieve, it failed to show how Green Mark Buildings be able to bring power consumption down significantly. In addition, the authority has also failed to show Green Buildings can actually bring many benefits other than cost-efficient.
Firstly, there are many environmental benefits with Green Buildings. One will be a reduction in water and power usage. In the BCA summary report survey "Perception towards Green Buildings in Singapore" by Wong, Kaul & Xiu Wei (2017), it highlighted that more than 90% of public and private homeowners agree green buildings do lower the power and water usage and minimize the environmental impact. The usage of solar panels, energy efficient appliances and having other energy-saving features in green buildings bring down the operation cost and utility bills significantly. More than 70% of the homeowners would rather use fans in their house instead of air-conditioners, as it helps in energy saving as well as the reduction in the potential negative impact on the environment.
Besides the environmental benefits, BCA study had shown that Green Buildings also contributed to social benefits. For instance, Wong, Kaul & Xiu Wei (2017) reported that at least 80% of homeowners say better air quality was rank as the top reason for health benefits. In the article "Green buildings also better for health, not just more energy efficient: BCA study" by Boh (2017), it was mentioned that " People who work in 'green' buildings are less likely to suffer from fatigue, headache and even skin irritation". Boh (2017) also mentioned that due to better filters, the green buildings are able to keep particles such as bacteria and fungi out of the buildings. Hence the green buildings able to provide better air quality for people who stay or work in green buildings.
All in all, I believe Green Mark building will bring many benefits to our lives. Global and local studies all show that Green Mark building are very cost efficient over their lifetime. With many benefits on hands, I believe the awareness will spread among people very soon with the right campaign.
References:
MacKenzie (2017). Green buildings, Singapore’s natural ally for a greener future. Retrieved February 11, 2019, from https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/commentary-green-buildings-singapore-s-natural-ally-for-a-9183380
Wong, Kaul & Xiu Wei (2017). Perception towards Green Buildings in Singapore. Retrieved February 11, 2019, from https://www.bca.gov.sg/newsroom/others/Summary_Report_Survey_on_BCA_Green_Mark.pdf
Boh (2017). Green buildings also better for health, not just more energy efficient: BCA study. Retrieved February 11, 2019, from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/green-buildings-also-better-for-health-not-just-more-energy-efficient-bca-study
No comments:
Post a Comment